Negative Body Language...
Actual GD Video with Faculty Tips
“Group Discussion”, popularly labeled as GD, is a methodology used by an organization (company, institute, business school etc) to gauge whether the candidate has certain personality traits and/or skills that it desires in its members. In this methodology, the group of candidates is given a topic or a situation, typically given some time to think about the same, and then asked to discuss it among themselves for a specific duration (which may vary from one organization to another). As in a football game, where you play like a team, passing the ball to each team member and aim for a common goal, GD is also based on team work, incorporating views of different team members to reach a common goal.
This is indicative of your ability to impart direction to the group and define the key issue(s) along which the discussion has to progress. The three “Cs” which rank you high on this parameter are clarity (the main points to be discussed),content (the vertical depth in each point) and confidence. The “Key Word Approach”, wherein you start with defining the dominant words in the topic and then develop subsequent constructs, can help you to initiate effectively.
E.g. in a topic like “Should Republic Day celebrations be redefined?, the key words are “Republic” and “ redefined”. Thus giving a backdrop against which this day is celebrated, then graduating to the way it is celebrated and finally talking about ways and means of redefining (if at all) the celebrations, can be a good strategy. If demonstrated properly, this skill gets you in visible limelight and reflects your ability to break the ice and evoke a discussion!. However, if mishandled (e.g, you may start off on a high note and then abruptly recede into an eerie silence), it puts you in an embarrassing position!
This is reflective of your ability to have an opinion on issues and concerns of contemporary relevance and hence your ability to connect with different aspects of the environment (economic, political, business, social etc). It assumes even more relevance for a fact intensive topic like “Indian Economy in the post WTO regime”, where knowledge becomes a sharp differentiator and helps you to leverage a strong competitive advantage. Unless you have the requisite knowledge w.r.t “WTO and its implications for the Indian Economy”, your discussion runs the danger of being shallow and superficial. Being well versed with current affairs and issues of contemporary importance can help you to do well along this parameter.
Research on communication has established that people while in groups tend to behave differently compared to one to one situation. The simple communication model requires a sender-receiver interface, where the sender sends the desired message to the receiver, who in turn gives a feedback to the sender to complete the process.Even in this simple process; the message which the sender sends out is not necessarily that which the receiver receives. The sender's body language may cause the message to be interpreted differently. The receiver's own biases may be in operation. In a group situation, there is one sender of a communication but several receivers, and this further complicates matters. When the group members react differently - it becomes extremely important for the sender of the message to gain control and ensure that the discussion proceeds along his/her way, if the thread is lost then the discussion shifts over to another topic and is out of control of the actual sender. One way to do this is to state only one point at a time and elaborate on it. If two or more points are stated by one speaker, what usually happens is that only one point is taken up for further discussion. If in a discussion, you find an idea or thought being misinterpreted, then intervene and reclarify your message.
While in a group discussion - it is extremely important not to provoke the ire of the group towards you, your behavior towards the members of the group should be such that it makes them feel comfortable with you and your ideas. Referring to a point made by an earlier speaker and building on your point will not only help you score points with the other participants, but also with the selectors. If possible, refer to the participant by name (incase the participants have introduced themselves at the onset). Hostile behavior towards a member further breaks down the communication process. If you find a member of the group being hostile to you, keep calm. One way to diffuse the tension would be to say, “Well, I do not agree with my friend here. Let us agree to disagree”. While the group is thinking and yet to start on the discussion, you can establish yourself as the leader and lay a few ground rules for the discussion to proceed you could indicate the time to budget for each of the stages.
| Contribution: |
Your contribution in a group discussion is evaluated from a dual perspective :-
Role in which you contribute: |
Whereby you can assume the role of a leader (somebody effectively moderating the discussion/ evoking a positive response from fellow peers), a fountain head (somebody constantly fuelling the discussion with novel ideas) or a piggy rider (somebody who rides on an idea already floated in the discussion but not leveraged properly; this is the last thing to do lest you dwindle out of the discussion and it requires a gift of the gab and significantly high group skills).
Nature of contribution: |
Which can be viewed as positive (somebody able to create a sense of camaraderie amongst peers and able to get the group to discuss the topic in a constructive and positive way) or negative (somebody who dampens the spirit of the group and impedes the enthusiasm of the group to participate and discuss).
This indicates your ability to effectively flowchart your thought process and analyze the topic in a comprehensive manner. It reflects your ability to construct logical arguments and structure the discussion in a streamlined manner, avoiding random forays.
This reflects your ability to think off the feet and contribute on a creative and unorthodox tangent. It is even more relevant for an abstract topic, where the scope to view the topic from an avant-garde angle is proportionately more (e.g in a topic like “red and blue”, somebody who translates this into a coke (red) and pepsi (blue) warfare or discuss the marketing strategies of kingfisher (red) and jet (blue) or harp on the gender differences as mentioned in John Gray’s “ Men are from Mars (red) and women are from Venus (blue)’, will definitely stand apart)
This evaluates the candidate’s ability to connect with the group and is measured from a dual perspective – verbal and non-verbal. While verbal communication scores the student on parameters like fluency, articulation and modulation, the non-verbal quotient defines his/her adequacy vis-à-vis body language, gesticulation, eye contact and posture.